Inverted gracilis muscle free flap with intraoral vascular anastomoses for facial reanimation in vessel depleted neck: A case report.

The reinnervated gracilis muscle free flap represents a workhorse of facial reanimation. This procedure is carried out secondarily to parotid resections, due to advanced tumors that spread to the surrounding structures. Finding recipient vessels might be problematic if other reconstructive procedures are needed to address the defects. This paper describes a procedure to inset a reinnervated gracilis muscle free flap in a vessel depleted patient, through intraoral anastomoses to avoid venous interposition grafts. A 52-year-old man developed an advanced adenocarcinoma of the deep parotid lobe and underwent radical surgical excision including the mandibular ramus, condyle, and facial soft tissues (defect size: 8 cm × 4 cm). A secondary double-flap reconstruction restored the mandibular defect and inset a cross-face nerve graft. A third intervention finalized the facial reanimation with a 10 cm reinnervated gracilis muscle free flap. The gracilis flap inset was inverted resulting in the proximal flap (pedicle side) lying on the buccal aspect. This allowed vessel joining from the contralateral side via intraoral anastomoses. No complications occurred within and after the intervention. However, the adenocarcinoma relapsed before reinnervation of the gracilis. The patient also had distant brain and lung metastases and received best supportive care. The inverted gracilis muscle free flap may represent an option for attaining facial reanimation in vessel-depleted patients avoiding long interposition venous grafts.

Reconstruction surgery in head and neck cancer patients amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Current practice and lessons for the future.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has imposed a radical change in daily life and work routine. In this context, health systems have suffered important and serious repercussions in all fields. Among the changes brought about by the state of global health emergency, adjustments to guidelines, priorities, structures, professional teams, and epidemiological data stand out. In light of this, the oncological field has witnessed several changes in the approach to cancer, whether due to delay in diagnosis, screening deficit, personnel shortage or the psychological impact that the pandemic has had on cancer patients. This article focuses on the management of oral carcinoma and the surgical approaches that oral and maxillofacial specialists have had at their disposal during the health emergency. In this period, the oral and maxillofacial surgeons have faced many obstacles. The proximity of maxillofacial structures to the airways, the need of elective and punctual procedures in cancerous lesions, the aggressiveness of head and neck tumors, and the need for important healthcare costs to support such delicate surgeries are examples of some of the challenges imposed for this field. One of the possible surgical 'solutions' to the difficulties in managing surgical cases of oral carcinoma during the pandemic is locoregional flaps, which in the pre-COVID-19 era were less used than free flaps. However, during the health emergency, its use has been widely reassessed. This setback may represent a precedent for opening up new reflections. In the course of a long-term pandemic, a reassessment of the validity of different medical and surgical therapeutic approaches should be considered. Finally, given that the pandemic has high-lighted vulnerabilities and shortcomings in a number of ways, including the issues of essential resource shortages, underinvestment in public health services, lack of coordination and versatility among politicians, policymakers and health leaders, resulting in overloaded health systems, rapid case development, and high mortality, a more careful analysis of the changes needed in different health systems to satisfactorily face future emergencies is essential to be carried out. This should be directed especially towards improving the management of health systems, their coordination as well as reviewing related practices, even in the surgical field.